EKU's waste of funds, goodwill;
fighting open-records law a mistake
Kentucky taxpayers invested $33 million to build a
performing arts center at Eastern Kentucky University, a public
university. EKU hired Debra Hoskins to manage that center at a salary,
on the public payroll, of $108,000 a year.
Yet, when things went
bad between EKU and Hoskins, the university insisted documents about her
dismissal/resignation and the issues that led up to it shouldn't be
open to that taxpaying public.
Both Hoskins and the university
relied on the remarkable legal argument that a confidentiality agreement
the two parties agreed to at the time of her departure (a $76,591.04
settlement plus "other considerations" paid by, guess who?) trumped the
state's open-records law.
When the Herald-Leader's Rich Copley
asked for documents related to the separation, Hoskins and EKU didn't
want to release most of them. When the attorney general's office, which
has the responsibility for interpreting open-records law, agreed with
the paper and ordered that the documents be handed over, they still
weren't convinced.
So they contested the order to release the documents in court, where they again lost.
Thankfully, under Kentucky's good open-records law, they never had much chance to win.
Still, EKU burned up yet more public resources — its own and those of the courts — by contesting the inevitable.
The
money and time spent on this are bad enough, but the most disturbing
aspect here is that a university — a place that exists ultimately to
teach people to question, to examine, to debate — took as its first line
of defense denying answers to legitimate questions.
EKU, of course, is not alone in its tendency to seek refuge in stonewalling when bad or embarrassing news arises.
The
University of Kentucky is contesting an attorney general's order to
respond to a request for information by suing a reporter at its own
campus radio station.
What's the message to students from these stories? Leave your curiosity in the classroom where it can't do any harm?
What is the message to taxpayers? Just pay the bills and we'll tell you what we think you need to know?
When
Madison Circuit Judge William G. Clouse Jr. ruled that EKU must turn
over the documents, he wrote, "the public has a right to confidence in
its institutions and the people that make decisions," and the way to
gain that confidence is "to understand what happened."
A new
president, Michael T. Benson, will soon take over at EKU. As will happen
for anyone who ever runs an organization the size of EKU, sooner or
later something will go wrong under his watch. When it does, let's hope
he remembers Clouse's wise words.
The public can't have
confidence in the institution unless it can understand what happened.
It's advice the presidents of Kentucky's other public universities
should also take to heart.
And this:
Judge: EKU must release most records related to Hoskins' tenure at arts center
Madison Circuit Judge William G. Clouse Jr. ruled Tuesday that
Eastern Kentucky University must release the majority of documents the
Herald-Leader is seeking related to the departure last June of EKU
Center for the Arts director Debra Hoskins.
The university and Hoskins have 14 days to appeal the ruling or produce the documents.
After
the hearing Tuesday morning, in which attorneys for EKU, Hoskins and
the Herald-Leader went through the contested documents, attorneys for
the university and Hoskins said they had not decided whether they would
appeal the rulings.
Hoskins was present at the hearing but did not speak.
Included
in the documents was a June 12 letter from Skip Daugherty, executive
assistant to EKU President Doug Whitlock, listing reasons the university
was moving to fire Hoskins.
"If you read that letter, clearly and
plainly the intent was Mr. Daugherty was saying to Ms. Hoskins, 'We're
going to fire you, but if you want, you can choose this other action,'"
Clouse said. "To my mind, that was final.
"These other letters may
be a series of final actions that supplement this final action. This is
the one letter, the one place I can find that clearly takes the
administration view on the grounds for releasing Ms. Hoskins."
EKU's
attempt to dismiss Hoskins was blocked by the Center for the Arts'
community operations board, which said only the board had authority to
terminate the director's employment. Hoskins resigned shortly after
EKU's attempt to fire her.
Hoskins and attorneys for EKU said the
letter was superseded by Hoskins' resignation, but Clouse said, "This is
what the public record is all about."
The Herald-Leader sought a
variety of documents relating to Hoskins' tenure in managing the
brand-new, $33 million publicly financed arts center. The university
produced a portion of the documents, primarily financial in nature, but
withheld many others, citing a confidentiality agreement with Hoskins.
In
October, Kentucky Attorney General Jack Conway's office ruled that
confidentiality agreements do not trump the open-records laws, and EKU
initially said it would release the documents. University officials
reversed themselves shortly after that, saying the agreement compelled
the university to fight any disclosure of the documents.
In
Tuesday's hearing, the university and Hoskins' attorney reasserted their
contentions that disclosure of the documents would constitute
unwarranted invasions of Hoskins' and others' privacy.
Clouse, however, said, "Being embarrassed is not grounds enough" to withhold records covered under the open records laws.
"The
court's feeling is the public has a right to confidence in its
institutions and the people that make decisions," Clouse said. "This
type of document, while it may be embarrassing for your client, is
important for the public to gain that confidence in their institution —
to understand what happened."
The attorneys agreed that when
records are released, names of students and lower-level employees and
any revealing information about them would be redacted. But the names of
a "whistleblower" and decision makers, including board members,
executive staff and university officials, would not be struck.
In
March, the university and Hoskins released a number of documents that
revealed pervasive concerns about Hoskins' management of the center,
including mishandling of customer credit card information and misuse of
information from her previous employer, Centre College's Norton Center
for the Arts in Danville.
Hoskins has disputed many of the accusations in the documents, including deliberate underpayment of artists.
In Tuesday's hearing, Clouse and the attorneys agreed that several documents being sought were favorable to Hoskins.
The
court ruled in the Herald-Leader's favor on the majority of the
documents, but Clouse decided against the Herald-Leader's assertion that
EKU had not acted in good faith regarding the Open Records Act in
crafting its agreement with Hoskins.
"Eastern has made every effort today to be understanding of the court's rulings," Clouse said.
He
said the crux of the argument was whether the resignation or attempted
termination of Hoskins was the "final action," and although he
determined that it was the attempted termination, he said, "Eastern took
a position it thought was well-founded in the law, and I cannot find
that they acted in bad faith."
Read more here: http://www.kentucky.com/2013/04/16/2602712/judge-eku-must-release-most-records.html#storylink=cpy
Read more here: http://www.kentucky.com/2013/04/16/2602712/judge-eku-must-release-most-records.html#storylink=cpy
2 comments:
What saddens me about the H-L is that they will rip UK and EKU but almost never, NEVER, attack FCPS. As the recent postings by Dr. Day show, the H-L overlooked (willingly) the opportunity to tell the public of the Rosalind Hurley-Richards case.
When they like you, the H-L editors will shield you from negative press coverage, as they have done with Stu Silberman.
Maybe they need to strategically reallocate more funds toward expanding attorney fees and cut some programs.
Got to go, almost time for the ZZ Top concert - nothing like how higher ed enriches a community and serves the region.
Post a Comment