Thursday, July 02, 2009

Common Standards far from a Done Deal


States weigh setting one bar for students

47 States Sign on
0 Agree to Sign up
Efforts to establish national education standards have always foundered on the shoals of culture wars and fears of too much federal control. But the time may be ripe for something close: a common set of standards for K-12 math and reading that states could opt to adopt.

Forty-seven states now support drafting such standards by year's end. Secretary of Education Arne Duncan has been using his bully pulpit, and the promise of federal stimulus money, to encourage states to abandon the current mishmash of individual standards.

"We've got the best shot we've ever had at getting national standards and tests in this country," says Michael Petrilli of the Thomas B. Fordham Institute, a research group in Washington that recently hosted a discussion on internationally benchmarked standards. "But there's still a lot of peril on the road," he says. While state leaders are eager to collaborate, "not a single state has promised to adopt the standards."

Advocates see an opportunity to create stronger requirements that could put American students on better footing for pursuing college and 21st-century careers. Many complain that US standards are broad and shallow, compared with a number of top-performing countries that build around key concepts learned in depth.

But not everyone is cheering. Some teacher bloggers suggest that talk of national standards is simply a way for politicians to act tough on education, and they lump it in the same category as the unpopular No Child Left Behind Act. And three states – Alaska, South Carolina, and Texas – have not joined the "Common Core" initiative, led by the National Governors Association (NGA) and the Council of Chief State School Officers (CCSSO).

Though powerful people – including President Obama – are promoting the idea, it is by no means a done deal...

2 comments:

Anonymous said...

The NGA and CCSSO released the names of the work group members and a second group called the "feedback" group for the Common Standards for ELA and mathematics. The list can be seen here: http://tinyurl.com/kodxto

On the whole, it is not a remarkable group of scholars in the work groups. What is curious is the participation of assessment people in the feedback group. That would seem premature.

It is also somewhat amusing - or disturbing - to note the number of typos in the press release.

Richard Day said...

Thanks for the comment and link. I'll give it a look.

On the early involvement of assessment folks....I actually see that as a positive thing.

In my view, there are essentially only two broad questions to be answered in curriculum development: 1) What do you want students to know or be able to do? ...and 2) What will you accept as evidence that they know or can can do it? (This is pretty much in agreement with Wiggins, McTighe, Fink...)

Set the standards. Then design the assessment. And only then develop the lessons and formative assessments that lead to success on the summative assessment.