This from Matthew Yglesias at Slate:
Pope Francis'
latest apostolic exhortation
covers a number of topics, but really lights into libertarian
economics. There's a lot of stuff about Jesus in his thinking that I
can't really sign on to but here's a great point about media priorities
and the declining marginal value of income:
How can it be that it is not a news item when an elderly
homeless person dies of exposure, but it is news when the stock market
loses two points? This is a case of exclusion. Can we continue to stand
by when food is thrown away while people are starving? This is a case of
inequality. Today everything comes under the laws of competition and
the survival of the fittest, where the powerful feed upon the powerless.
As a consequence, masses of people find themselves excluded and
marginalized: without work, without possibilities, without any means of
escape.
But importantly, he follows up with a specific invocation of the need
for state action rather than simple trust in the beneficence of the
powerful:
In this context, some people continue to defend trickle-down
theories which assume that economic growth, encouraged by a free
market, will inevitably succeed in bringing about greater justice and
inclusiveness in the world. This opinion, which has never been confirmed
by the facts, expresses a crude and naïve trust in the goodness of
those wielding economic power and in the sacralized workings of the
prevailing economic system.
And, again, not a call for charity or goodwill toward the poor but
specifically for economic regulation and democratic supervision of the
capitalist system:
While the earnings of a minority are growing exponentially,
so too is the gap separating the majority from the prosperity enjoyed by
those happy few. This imbalance is the result of ideologies which
defend the absolute autonomy of the marketplace and financial
speculation. Consequently, they reject the right of states, charged with
vigilance for the common good, to exercise any form of control. A new
tyranny is thus born, invisible and often virtual, which unilaterally
and relentlessly imposes its own laws and rules.
And on externalities:
In this system, which tends to devour everything which
stands in the way of increased profits, whatever is fragile, like the
environment, is defenseless before the interests of a deified market,
which become the only rule.
Again, a call for political change:
A financial reform open to such ethical considerations would
require a vigorous change of approach on the part of political leaders.
I urge them to face this challenge with determination and an eye to the
future, while not ignoring, of course, the specifics of each case.
Money must serve, not rule! The Pope loves everyone, rich and poor
alike, but he is obliged in the name of Christ to remind all that the
rich must help, respect and promote the poor.
I've heard a number of conservative Catholic commentators remark
numerous times that it's silly for left-wing people to be highlighting
Pope Francis' thoughts on economic policy because all this stuff has
been Catholic doctrine for a long time. I think this misses the point.
Obviously a new pope isn't going to make up a new religious doctrine
from scratch. But when you have a corpus of thinking and tradition that
spans centuries, it makes a great deal of difference what you emphasize.
I remember very clearly having been an intern in Chuck Schumer's
office and attending with the senator, some of his staff, and a wide
swathe of New York City political elites an event at St Patrick's
Cathedral to celebrate the posthumous award of the Congressional Gold
Medal to Archbishop John O'Connor. His successor, Archbishop Egan,
delivered an address that went on at length about O'Connor's charitable
work, but on a public policy level addressed almost exclusively
the Church's support for banning abortion, for discriminating against
gay and lesbian couples, and for school vouchers. That was a choice he
made about what he thought it was important for people to hear about.
Pope Francis is making a different kind of choice.
1 comment:
As a Catholic, I think it is tough being the Pope. You say help the poor but you've got to have some folks who are making some good dough in order to have folks fill the coffers of social redistribution. I get where he is coming from but at the same time I am not so sure many of our clergy really know what it means to live a real world life as an adult who has children to feed, a spouse to negotiate familial priorities while working a job at a minimum of 5 days a week.
I respect and value the path he is taking our faith down, it is certainly needed but I am not so sure it is a simple as painting the rich as being in the wrong. Some folks who are on the needy side have made and continue to make decision which have placed them where they are in life. Similarly, I don't think our governmental leaders have proven themselves much better at wealth distribution as evidence by their political party extremism, corruption and general self interest than would be worthy of placing further trust.
Post a Comment