Two decades ago, the Council for Better Education's efforts
led to a landmark court decision to strengthen Kentucky schools and to a
reform act from the General Assembly.
Now, the council — composed
of nearly all school districts in Kentucky — is raising money for a
study that could show lawmakers that school funding needs to be
restored.
"We must have independent verification based on
scientific measurement to verify what we already know. We are severely
underfunded and must receive adequate funding to ensure all students
become college- and career-ready," council president Tom Shelton said in
a recent email to superintendents in the state.
The $130,000
study, which could begin Dec. 1, would design an equitable and adequate
funding system to allow all students in Kentucky to become college- and
career-ready, said Shelton, who is also superintendent of Fayette County
Public Schools.
Getting more school funding is important because
taxpayers are having to take on more of the burden of funding their
school districts, he said. Several school districts have had to increase
their tax rates "because the state's not stepped up and funded us" as
the state Constitution requires, Shelton said.
Last month, Stu
Silberman, head of the Prichard Committee for Academic Excellence and
former Fayette superintendent, and Ali Wright, a teacher from
Lexington's Lafayette High School, told lawmakers on a budget
subcommittee what the cuts meant for schools. The duo — attending on
behalf of the Kentucky Education Action Team, a group of state education
associations — told lawmakers that no money had been allotted for
hardback or online textbooks since 2010. Wright said hardback books in
one of her classes, used by students who have a shot at attending the
nation's top colleges, are falling apart.
The SEEK program, the
primary source of money for school districts, accounts for about $2.9
billion a year and is used for everything from classroom instruction to
school bus maintenance. The amount of SEEK funds has remained flat, but
schools have seen increases in the number of students and average daily
attendance figures. That caused the amount of funding per student to
slip from $3,866 in 2009 to $3,827 this year.
Flexible focus
funds — which include textbooks, preschool, extended school services,
safe schools and staff professional development — also need to be
restored to 2008 levels, educators have said. The amount dropped from
$154 million in 2008 to $93 million this year.
Kentucky has
substantial numbers of students who are underperforming in comparison
with their peers, Shelton said. They include special needs students,
students of color, students living in poverty and students Shelton
called "English-language learners."
"We have got to create a
funding system that will provide for the resources for those students to
overcome those equity issues," he said.
Woodford County
Superintendent Scott Hawkins pointed to Education Week magazine's 2013
Quality Counts survey, which ranked Kentucky's education performance
10th in the nation but gave the state an "F" for the amount it spends
per pupil.
"We are not being funded at an adequate level to continue the progress that we've made," Hawkins said.
The Council for Better Education is a nonprofit corporation whose members include 169 of Kentucky's 173 public school districts.
Since
Shelton suggested the study in September, about 120 of the council's
school district members — including Fayette and Woodford — have decided
to help pay the cost, he said. Most district officials think restoring
school funding to 2008 levels is so important that they are voluntarily
paying 25 cents per student, using daily attendance aver ages to
determine the amount. That's about $1,000 for a district with average
daily attendance of 4,000 students.
Woodford County contributed $961, said Hawkins. In Fayette County, the amount was about $10,000, Shelton said.
Meanwhile,
Kentucky Education Commissioner Terry Holliday weighed in this week,
saying he was "focused on working with the General Assembly to restore
education funding to 2008 levels."
House Speaker Greg Stumbo,
D-Prestonsburg, said in a statement to the Herald-Leader that "if there
is one vote that the people can count on to increase funding for public
education, it is mine." Stumbo said he was House majority floor leader
when the Kentucky Education Reform Act passed in 1990 and played a major
role in shepherding that legislation, and the funding tied with it,
through the General Assembly.
Jodi Whitaker, communications
director for the state Senate Majority Caucus, did not make a commitment
for votes but said, "We want education to be funded at a level that
meets the needs of children and ensures them a quality education.
"As always, funding is a challenge. I'm sure it will be a topic of discussion during the upcoming legislative session."
Shelton
said the study would look at data from student tests since Senate Bill 1
was passed in 2009. That legislation essentially said the new
measurement for student achievement would be career and college
readiness; it led to changes in the student testing structure.
He said the study would be conducted by consultants with Picus Odden & Associates, a California-based research firm.
Michael
Goetz, senior associate of Picus Odden & Associates, said in an
Oct. 15 memorandum to Shelton that the study wouldn't just be about
resources, "but about how resources can be turned into effective
instruction that boosts student learning."
In the past, the council has used measures other than a study to get a funding boost.
The
Council for Better Education has been the plaintiff in two cases to
strengthen Kentucky education, one of which led to the Kentucky Supreme
Court's landmark 1989 ruling on Kentucky's constitutional commitment to
elementary and secondary education, according to its website.
The General Assembly responded to the court decision by passing the Kentucky Education Reform Act of 1990.
The
council was not successful in a second lawsuit against the General
Assembly that was filed about 10 years ago, but Shelton thinks it led
to a school funding increase from the General Assembly at the time.
He
said that the motive for the proposed study is not a lawsuit and that
he had had no discussion with his group about filing a lawsuit against
the General Assembly if funding is not restored or increased.
2 comments:
What do you expect out of group of group of legislators whose most creative idea for raising revenue is slot machines and shifting tax burden to locals. Their lack of political will to address tax reform and restructuring only ensures continued entrenchment or reduction in state funding for services which all folks are suppose to be equally receiving from the state.
Picus has already done two studies on Kentucky. What more can he add this time?
Could spending a six-digit sum of taxpayer money on yet another Picus report backfire on the CBE when legislators ask similar questions including why this money was sent out of state?
Post a Comment