As Fiscal Cliff Looms, Impact would be Catastrophic to Education says National School Boards Association
This from 
Clarksville Online:
As lawmakers reconvene to discuss alternatives to the fiscal cliff, 
the National School Boards Association (NSBA) continues to urge Congress
 and President Barack Obama to forge a bipartisan solution that puts our
 children’s education first and protects their future, as well as the 
future of our country.

With the fiscal cliff looming, more than 600 school boards have 
passed resolutions urging Congress to stop the across-the-board cuts 
that would have a detrimental impact upon their school districts through
 the sequestration process.
These federal cuts would total more than $4 billion this fiscal 
year. Furthermore, these cuts would continue over a 10-year period and 
have a devastating effect on our schools, eroding the base of funding 
for key programs year after year.
“The federal cuts to education would be a regression to the progress 
our school districts have made in student achievement, from deep cuts to
 Title I grants for disadvantaged students and the Individuals with 
Disabilities Education Act, to House-passed legislation that would 
impose mandatory reductions eliminating automatic eligibility of 280,000
 low-income students for free school lunches,” said Michael A. Resnick, 
NSBA’s Associate Executive Director for Public Policy and Federal 
Advocacy.
K-12 education programs have already been reduced on the federal 
level with cuts to elementary and secondary education funding in Fiscal 
Year 2011. The ability to absorb additional budget cuts and provide an 
enhanced curriculum for all students is extremely limited for many 
school districts.
“An agreement is urgently needed now that protects education, as 
federal investments in education yield returns that result in greater 
productivity, global competitiveness, higher revenues, and increased 
employment,” said NSBA’s President C. Ed Massey, a member of the Boone 
County (Ky.) Board of Education.
This from 
PBS:
With tax increases and across-the-board spending cuts set to take 
effect in January if lawmakers and the President fail to reach a 
debt-reduction deal, education providers are being forced to plan for 
tighter budgets. In many cases, that would mean jobs lost and reduced 
services for students.
The aspect of the "cliff" that would impact education budgets most 
directly is sequestration -- mandatory cuts to discretionary federal 
spending. The White House Office of Management and Budget estimates 
sequestration would reduce discretionary spending, which includes 
federal education money, by roughly 8.2 percent. 
1. The Education Department Is Just Part of the Picture
If sequestration happens, the Department of Education would see 
cutbacks in most of its major programs including funding for 
lower-income school districts, teacher training, special education and 
improvements for under-performing schools.
2. The Effects Would be Uneven
 
While a straight 8 percent cut would seem to suggest everybody would 
share the fiscal pain equally, things get cloudier when you look at how 
federal education money is distributed. On average, money from 
Washington only makes up about 10 percent of public school funding, with
 the rest coming from state and local governments. But the actual 
spending breakdown is weighted towards services for the most vulnerable 
students.
3. It Won't Happen All At Once
 
If educators were looking for any bit of good news, it might be that 
their section of the "cliff" doesn't appear to be a sheer drop.
4. Even If There's a Deal, Things Aren't Certain
 
There is still the possibility 
that the two parties could reach an agreement. But what's not clear is 
what a deal would mean for education funding. Ed Week's Alyson Klein 
reports that even if sequestration takes effect, "some programs are 
exempt, including federal student loans, some Pell Grant money, most 
child nutrition programs, and the Children's Health Insurance Program," 
which could likely mean they would also be kept off the table in a 
budget deal.
 
 
          
      
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
No comments:
Post a Comment