If you read the news magazines or watch TV, you might get the impression that American education is deep in a crisis of historic proportions. The media tell you that other nations have higher test scores than ours and that they are shooting past us in the race for global competitiveness. The pundits say it’s because our public schools are overrun with incompetent, lazy teachers who can’t be fired and have a soft job for life.
Don’t believe it. It’s not true.
Critics have been complaining about the public schools for the past 60 years. In the 1950s, they said that the public schools were failing, Johnny couldn’t read, and the schools were in a downward spiral. In the 1960s, we were told there was a “crisis in the classroom.” For at least the past half-century we have heard the same complaints again and again. Yes, our students’ scores on international tests are only average, but when the first such test was given in 1964, we were 12th out of 12. Our students have never been at the top on those tests.
The critics today would have us believe that our future is in peril because other nations have higher test scores. They said the same thing in 1957 when the Soviet Union sent its Sputnik into orbit and “beat us” by being first. At the time, the media were filled with dire predictions and blamed our public schools for losing the space race. But we’re still here, and the Soviet Union is gone.
Maybe those tests are not good predictors of future economic success or decline. Is it possible that we succeeded not because of test scores but because our society encourages something more important than test scores: the freedom to create, innovate, imagine, and think differently? ...
A web-based destination for aggregated news and commentary related to public school education in Kentucky and related topics.
Friday, September 02, 2011
American Schools in Crisis
This from Diane Ravitch in the Saturday Evenming Post:
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comment:
But if that were true it would mean that we are really wasting our time with all of these assessments and that we don't actually need to re package curriculum under different names in order to exist in a continous state of disjointed anxiety or spend millions of dollars on efforts to "unbridle" our schools. You mean we should just expect teachers to teach what they think our kids need to know? How could we ever exist without ETS, DOE or KDE?
Post a Comment