Arne Duncan, the secretary of education, recently called for sweeping changes to the way we select and train teachers. He’s right. If we really want good schools, we need to create a critical mass of great teachers. And if we want smart, passionate people to become these great educators, we have to attract them with excellent programs and train them properly in the substance and practice of teaching.
Our best universities have, paradoxically, typically looked down their noses at education, as if it were intellectually inferior. The result is that the strongest students are often in colleges that have no interest in education, while the most inspiring professors aren’t working with students who want to teach. This means that comparatively weaker students in less intellectually rigorous programs are the ones preparing to become teachers.
So the first step is to get the best colleges to throw themselves into the fray. If education was a good enough topic for Plato, John Dewey and William James, it should be good enough for 21st-century college professors.
These new teacher programs should be selective, requiring a 3.5 undergraduate grade point average and an intensive application process. But they should also be free of charge, and admission should include a stipend for the first three years of teaching in a public school...
To fix our schools, we need teaching programs that are as rich in resources, interesting, high-reaching and thoughtful as the young people we want to attract to the profession. Show me a school where teachers are smart, well-educated, skilled and happy to be there, and I’ll show you a group of children who are getting a good education.
3 comments:
I think we need to start by acknowledging gender-bias.
Good teachers and (former principals turned education professors) should know that there are other educators besides Dewey, Plato, William James. In a heavily feminized profession, it is unsettling to see not a female educator listed in this post.
Your quarrel is with the author of the Times piece but you raise a couple of interesting questions.
Early on, I think Jane Addams might make the list but I'm having trouble coming up with more. Who did you have in mind?
"Feminized?" Hummm. That infers a profession substantially controlled by women - and that was simply not the case in those more repressive times.
It's certainly true that after the civil war, teaching came to be seen as "women's work." But as good as that was in many ways, it had a substantial downside. I'm not sure "feminized" is exactly right.
Maria Montessori is just one well-known educator...I'm sure Karen Tice and Beth Goldtein could help you all add to the list..
Post a Comment