This from the 
New York Times:
    
The 
Pearson Foundation, 
the charitable arm of one of the nation’s largest educational 
publishers, will pay $7.7 million to settle accusations that it 
repeatedly broke New York State law by assisting in for-profit ventures.
        
 

An inquiry by 
Eric T. Schneiderman, 
the New York State attorney general, found that the foundation had 
helped develop products for its corporate parent, including course 
materials and software. The investigation also showed that the 
foundation had helped woo clients to Pearson’s business side by paying 
their way to education conferences that were attended by its employees. 
 
Under the terms of the agreement to be announced on Friday, the money, 
aside from $200,000 in legal expenses, will be directed to 100Kin10, a 
national effort led by a foundation, the Carnegie Corporation, to train more teachers in high-demand areas, including science, technology, engineering and math.
“The fact is that Pearson is a for-profit corporation, and they are 
prohibited by law from using charitable funds to promote and develop 
for-profit products,” Mr. Schneiderman said in a statement. “I’m pleased
 that this settlement will direct millions of dollars back to where they
 belong.”
Officials at Pearson and the foundation defended their work. 
“We have always acted with the best intentions and complied with the 
law,” they said, in a joint statement. “However, we recognize there were
 times when the governance of the foundation and its relationship with 
Pearson could have been clearer and more transparent.” 
The case shed a light on the competitive world of educational testing 
and technology, which Pearson has come to dominate. As federal and state
 leaders work to overhaul struggling schools by raising academic 
standards, educational companies are rushing to secure lucrative 
contracts in testing, textbooks and software. 
The inquiry by the attorney general focused on Pearson’s attempts to 
develop a suite of products around the Common Core, a new and more 
rigorous set of academic standards that has been adopted by 45 states 
and the District of Columbia. 
Around 2010, Pearson began financing an effort through its foundation to
 develop courses based on the Common Core. The attorney general’s report
 said Pearson had hoped to use its charity to win endorsements and 
donations from a “prominent foundation.” That group appears to be the 
Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. 
“Pearson Inc. executives believed that branding their courses by 
association with the prominent foundation would enhance Pearson’s 
reputation with policy makers and the education community,” a release 
accompanying the attorney general’s report said. 
Indeed, in April 2011, the Pearson Foundation and the Gates Foundation announced 
they would work together to create 24 new online reading and math courses aligned with the Common Core. 
Pearson executives believed the courses could later be sold 
commercially, the report said, and predicted potential profits of tens 
of millions of dollars. After Mr. Schneiderman’s office began its 
investigation, the Pearson Foundation sold the courses to Pearson for 
$15.1 million. 
The attorney general’s office also examined a series of education 
conferences sponsored by the Pearson Foundation, which paid for school 
officials to meet their foreign counterparts in places like Helsinki and
 Singapore. 
The trips were made public after 
a series of columns
 in The New York Times, which detailed the expensive hotels and meetings
 with corporate executives that were staples of the experience. 
Several school officials who went on the trips represented education 
departments that had contracts with Pearson. The investigation did not 
determine whether those officials had awarded any new contracts based on
 any improper influence. But the report found that executives from other
 companies were not invited to attend, giving Pearson’s corporate side a
 clear advantage. 
The attorney general portrayed a culture at Pearson in which the lines 
between business and charity were often blurred. Pearson remains the 
largest donor to the Pearson Foundation, and the staff of the foundation
 included several Pearson employees. The board was made up entirely of 
Pearson executives until 2012. 
As part of the agreement, the foundation said it would alter its 
governing structure by appointing three board members to review any 
financial transactions that might benefit the business side. The 
foundation also pledged to bar Pearson executives, in most instances, 
from attending its education conferences, and said it would not feature 
Pearson products at such meetings.        
1 comment:
So why should we be trusting Pearson and how much of our state's tax dollars are we forfeiting to them?
Even the "settlement" is kind of a joke in its supposed distribution - training teachers who are later going to be using their products. Its the equivalent of a grocery store giving folks $5 coupons when they come in to shop for a weeks worth of groceries.
With all due respect to College of Education professors, the teachers they are putting out into schools now, don't have a clue how to interpret testing data much less realize the flaws and inconsistencies in our own state's school accountability system or the shortcomings of the data which is presented by the state and its vendors. So you have (1) testing vendors who try to bribe and scam to get contracts they apparently can't always fulfill (but continue to get paid), (2) KDE which imposes assessment/accountability systems on students, teachers, principals and even superintendents, (3) teachers who have little understanding or training in new curriculum or assessment modes that seem to evolve on the fly each year, (4)a legislature which doesn't adequately fund education (but does pay the vendor contracts), (5) a governor who isn't funding teacher retirement funds and (6) most parents who don't have the slightest clue how schools are teaching their kids or what these assessment scores mean. What a mess!
Post a Comment