Search Profile Reveals Little Direction
..or is it, Too Many Directions?
Today I had planned to write about the professional characteristics the EKU
Presidential Search and Screening Committee was looking for in our next
president. But that’s not really possible.
At any rate, this afternoon
at 1:05PM, Chairman Craig Turner called to order the Search and Selection
Committee for EKU’s 12th president. Turner estimated the selection
to be “about 4 months away.”
After the
obligatory underscoring of the “importance of confidentiality” for committee
members, the meeting was turned over to Academic Search’s consultants, James
Appleberry and Carrie Hauser.
The
consultants reported that during their campus visit, “people were very nice”
and helped the firm put together the draft profile along with an ad for the Chronicle of Higher Education and other
publications. “Our search process is now ready to move forward,” Appleberry
announced.
Appleberry
underscored that the process would be an open process, with updates posted to the Search Website regularly. But
today’s process, while indeed open, shed little light. Faculty representatives
Malcolm Frisbie and Sheila Pressley, and others, raised questions about
something on Page 3; something on Page 2; something on Page 4; something on
Page 7; something else on Page 3, but I’m not sure what. There was something about
whether faculty and students were unique enough to brag about; whether any
candidate would know what CPE is; something about Model Lab School; whether
academic excellence should be stated positively or negatively; something about
the 3rd bullet point; something about Law Enforcement; something
about Nursing, and whether the Honors Program is unique.
We will have
to wait 24-48 hours to make sense of it, when the profile, which was tweaked by
committee members, will be posted to the website.
Committee
members were admonished that they are not representing any group, but that they
represent the future of the university. “Do not think you represent any
particular interest group…please put on your university-wide hat,” Hauser said.
“We have promised the candidates that we will make every attempt to keep names
confidential”…members who breach confidentiality could be open to a personal
lawsuit.
Hauser then
reviewed the schedule for advertising. A
“one-page” ad (which I’m not at all sure is the same thing as a full-page ad)
is planned for the 2nd edition of the Chronicle after the holidays.
The ad is intended to drive people to the profile on the Academic Search
website. Online ads are expected to be
up by Jan 11th.
Candidates
are being told to have their applications complete by Feb 14th to
receive “full consideration.”
“Our job is to go out and mine…applicants,”
Hauser said.
“We are Looking for 6 to 8
really good candidates,” Appleberry said.
The
committee members were presented with a screening tool that could be used to help
them screen candidates and they actually took a few minutes to practice using it
on a fictitious candidate’s resume. It
looked like it could be a useful thing for members to do….except that, you know...only
members got to see it.
Members were
admonished not to compare candidates by email or discuss rankings outside of
the meeting but to only form opinions during meeting after listening to one
another.
The process
members will follow is to sign on to Academic Search’s website to review
applications online. To safeguard confidentiality, each application is given a
number, and members will only refer to candidates by number in their
notes.
The
committee’s next meeting will be on Feb 20that 11am and will consist
of a closed screening session of 4-5 hours. Members are expected to arrive with
their candidates grouped A, B, or C - keepers, maybes and rejects.
Since visitors were left to divine what kind of candidate EKU is
actually seeking, I spoke to Carrie Hauser afterward to get a sense of what
we are looking for.
KSN&C: Are we looking
for a custodian of Eastern’s historical mission, or a cutting edge leader for
the 21st Century?
Hauser: “Both.”
KSN&C: “Really?”
Hauser: “Yes, all of that.”
1 comment:
I am sure that the parameters are about as descriptive and unique as most school mission statements. From what I gather the characteristics are seeking someone with multiple personalities:
A President who values tradition but possesses a 21st century vision
A President who is involved at all levels but allows departments to function autonomously
A President who maintains strong academic values but if responsive to public trends
A President who is willing to discard small, under enrolled programs but... not if it is my department.
We may be seeking a president but we are advertising and expecting a paradox.
Post a Comment