This from Marty Solomon in
H-L:
Many would be shocked to learn that they have been misled by
so-called "educational reformers," mistakenly told that American public
schools are in crisis.
|
Marty Solomon |
They've been told that schools are
failing because of poor teaching. And they have been given misleading
proof of this malaise because the U.S. does not rank at the top or near
the top in international competition and that the academic achievement
gap between poor and middle class kids is evidence of failure.
None of this is true. But why would these reformers keep bashing our public schools?
Well,
some of them are free-market libertarians who would like to convert
public schools into private schools. Some people want to start charter
schools and pay themselves six-figure salaries. And some companies make
millions in providing testing services and consultants to fix the
problems. And our schools have bought into the hype.
Our public
schools have invested billions of dollars in miracle cures. Everything
from high-stakes testing in an attempt to embarrass teachers, to raising
standards every couple of years, to converting "failing schools" to
private schools, to giving each child a laptop or iPad. Guess what?
None of this has made a difference.
The reason is that our
public schools are already among the best in the world. How can that be
with all the gloom and doom? Because the gloom and doom is
manufactured.
Take for example the fact that U.S. children do not
rank at or near the top in international comparisons. International
comparisons only show the average scores of all of the children taking
the test.
But the top-scoring nations have child-poverty rates in
the 5 percent range whereas the rate in the U.S. is nearly 20 percent.
So if you would take all U.S. children in schools where the poverty rate
is 10 percent or less, we would score above all other nations.
The
U.S. public school system is among the best in the world for middle
class children; but for kids from poverty, there is a problem. The
problem is that most children from poverty suffer almost insurmountable
hurdles.
While middle-class children generally start school
knowing letters and numbers, even words and some arithmetic, far too
many from poverty have none of these skills. They are often from
single-parent families and have inadequate vision, hearing and medical
care. Words spoken in the house are only a fraction of the vocabulary in
middle-class families. They start school so far behind that most can
never catch up. And while both middle-class and poor children progress
in school, the gap persists.
Yet, help is possible.
In
order to better deal with the academic achievement gap, each school
district could create one or more optional "power schools" where the
neediest kids could receive 9.5 hours of schooling daily, extra homework
nightly, extra schooling during Saturdays and summers with a required
contract with parents for strong parental commitment.
Parents
who desire to help their kids from poverty could apply to enroll their
children in these schools if they commit to the requirements of
providing daily parental encouragement and support.
The
California model might be adopted, in which schools with more than 55
percent of poor children can receive a 50 percent increase in per-pupil
funding so that extra, more intensive instruction can be provided.
Failing
schools are said to be those with consistently low average student test
scores. Reformers have decided that poor teaching is the problem when
nothing could be further from the truth. In every state and in virtually
every school district, schools with high percentages of poor children
invariably exhibit low test scores.
You can predict a school's
test scores with a high degree of accuracy simply by the percentage of
poor children enrolled. While power schools might be able to greatly
improve the situation the academic achievement gap will never be totally
erased as long as poverty exists in America.
Read more here: http://www.kentucky.com/2014/09/15/3429862_public-schools-under-siege-by.html?sp=/99/349/&rh=1#storylink=cpy
1 comment:
It is a paradox- SES is a strong predictor of academic achievement. Teachers are suppose to provide all students with an education which will allow them to be successful and over come any SES shortcomings which they have been brought up in. Thus teachers are responsible for wiping out poverty, but they can't because many of the children they are teaching come from low income households.
Post a Comment