This from the 
Center on International Education Benchmarking:
 Unlike the top-performing countries on the 2012 PISA, the United 
States stands out for the amount of external testing it requires for all
 students.  As the chart below shows, the United States is the only 
country among this set to require annual testing in primary and middle 
schools in reading and mathematics. A more typical pattern among the top-performers is a required gateway exam, or an exam that allows a 
student to move on to the next phase of education, at the end of primary
 school, the end of lower secondary school and the end of upper 
secondary school.  This is true of Canada (Ontario), China (Shanghai), 
Estonia, Poland and Singapore. In some of these cases, the secondary 
school exams are used to determine placement in the next level of 
schooling such as in Singapore and Shanghai where the lower 
school-leaving exam determines placement in upper secondary school. And
 in Poland, Shanghai and Singapore the upper secondary academic exam 
functions as an admission exam for university.  This differs from the 
United States where annual tests are used primarily for school and 
teacher accountability purposes.  In his edweek.org blog, NCEE President
 Marc Tucker has written extensively about the challenges associated 
with this type of accountability scheme.  In addition to administering 
census testing at only three or fewer points in a student’s school 
career, the top-performers typically test a broader range of subjects 
than English and mathematics, the subjects tested annually in the United
 States.
Unlike the top-performing countries on the 2012 PISA, the United 
States stands out for the amount of external testing it requires for all
 students.  As the chart below shows, the United States is the only 
country among this set to require annual testing in primary and middle 
schools in reading and mathematics. A more typical pattern among the top-performers is a required gateway exam, or an exam that allows a 
student to move on to the next phase of education, at the end of primary
 school, the end of lower secondary school and the end of upper 
secondary school.  This is true of Canada (Ontario), China (Shanghai), 
Estonia, Poland and Singapore. In some of these cases, the secondary 
school exams are used to determine placement in the next level of 
schooling such as in Singapore and Shanghai where the lower 
school-leaving exam determines placement in upper secondary school. And
 in Poland, Shanghai and Singapore the upper secondary academic exam 
functions as an admission exam for university.  This differs from the 
United States where annual tests are used primarily for school and 
teacher accountability purposes.  In his edweek.org blog, NCEE President
 Marc Tucker has written extensively about the challenges associated 
with this type of accountability scheme.  In addition to administering 
census testing at only three or fewer points in a student’s school 
career, the top-performers typically test a broader range of subjects 
than English and mathematics, the subjects tested annually in the United
 States.
How tests are used is also different among the high performers. 
South Korea and Japan test only for diagnostic purposes in the primary 
schools, and South Korea continues to test for diagnostic purposes 
through 10th grade. It is at the secondary level that they introduce 
the high stakes exams for students, with Japanese students required to 
take an entrance exam for upper secondary school and students in both 
countries required to take tests at the end of upper secondary school 
that will determine what kind of higher education institution they can 
enter. These tests are recognized as very high pressure for students 
and both countries are trying to address that issue.  In both Korea and 
Japan, some students enter a vocational training system at the upper 
secondary level and take tests to qualify for vocational credentials 
rather than the tests for entry into university.
Hong Kong and Finland have no required testing until the end of upper
 secondary school.  Taiwan is a bit of a hybrid, with no required 
testing in primary school, but a Basic Competency Test at the end of 
lower secondary (along with three required tests a year in each of three
 subjects during lower secondary) that determines admission to upper 
secondary school.
Below are three charts showing the required testing in the United 
States and the ten top-performing countries on PISA at the primary and 
secondary levels, as well as a chart of exams required for those who 
wish to enter higher education.



As the United States embarks on 
implementing tests to measure students’ mastery of the Common Core State
 Standards, it would be wise to keep in mind these very different models
 of not only test schedules, but format and purpose.  The tests in the 
top-performing countries come at key gateways when students advance from
 one school to another and have a purpose that is clearly understood by 
students, parents and teachers.  While we do not advocate using tests to
 track students into particular vocational or academic pathways, placing
 stakes on the exams for students certainly impacts how hard they work 
in school.
1 comment:
This is a story about a charter school that might lose it's charter. So why do I say it's why charter schools are a good thing? Because public schools which aren't serving their students never get threatened with shutdown. This one may be closed. That is a good thing. It's also a cautionary tale to those of you with kids in the charter system that you must always pay attention to what's going on in your school.
http://gazette.com/review-team-recommends-closure-of-colorado-springs-charter-school/article/1544626
Post a Comment