This from the
Bowling Green Daily News:
Kentucky
has come a long way from ranking near the bottom in K-12 education, and
a new report contends it's because of state legislation that helped
usher in key changes more than 20 years ago.
The
report was recently released by the Prichard Committee for Academic
Excellence and the Kentucky Chamber of Commerce. It says that the 1990
passage of the Kentucky Education Reform Act brought a range of changes
to public education in the state. They include helping to end the
problem of nepotism hiring in school districts, creating higher
standards for students, creating the state's first system for testing
those standards and equalizing funding among poor and wealthy school
districts, among other reforms.
Cory
Curl is the associate director of the Prichard Committee, which was
founded in 1983 to help public education in Kentucky move forward.
Back then, Curl said Kentucky
ranked 50th in the in nation for percentage of adults with high school
diplomas and 50th in adult literacy.
"Kentucky
has a really remarkable story to tell about how educational improvement
can happen when citizens and business and policymakers and parents work
together," Curl said. "We felt like this was a story that needed to be
told in a way that everyone can come to that common understanding."
Kentucky Chamber CEO and President Dave Adkisson also praised the report in a press release.
"We
think this report will help Kentuckians – whether they are policy
leaders, employers or interested citizens – gain a better understanding
of the state’s efforts to improve education through the years," he said.
"It provides a historical perspective while emphasizing the need to
continue to push for excellence."
Kentucky
now ranks among the top 10 in the nation for high school graduation
rates. To move forward, Curl said the state needs to do more to expand
education access and create more opportunities for low income and
minority students.
A
state-by-state report released by the Education Week Research Center
earlier this year gives Kentucky an overall grade of C and a rank of 27.
That report also placed fourth and eighth-grade reading and math
proficiency at just above the national average, with Kentucky ranking at
roughly 36 percent compared to 34.8 percent nationally. Kentucky
students participating in school lunch assistance programs are still
behind on proficiency, ranking below the national average of 30.1
percent at 26.3 percent.
Despite
ongoing hurdles, Kentucky has progressed since the passage of KERA. In
1983, economist David Birch described Kentucky as a third world country
with the nation's most uneducated workforce.
Real
change didn't begin until 1985 when 66 of the state's poorer school
districts sued the state arguing that funding was insufficient and
unequal. In 1989, the Kentucky Supreme Court ruled in Rose v. Council
for Better Education that the state's public school system was entirely
unconstitutional.
The fallout forced the General Assembly to not just equalize but recreate public education funding, the report says.
For
Curl, the biggest achievement of KERA was the creation of the Support
Education Excellence in Kentucky program to equalize school funding
across districts. A close second is the first real success at creating a
system to test how well students meet standards, she said.
It allowed the committee to look at which schools had top reading scores, for example.
"It
gave the public access to that kind of information," Curl said. "So it
changed mindsets. It showed what was possible when students have access
to high quality instruction."
When it comes to the state's current challenges, higher education access stands out.
A
breakdown of the total revenue of Kentucky's public post-secondary
institutions by source shows that state general fund dollars as a source
of funding have fallen from 30 percent in 2003 to 14 percent in 2015.
Meanwhile,
money from tuition and fees now is more than a quarter of total
revenue. It made up 17 percent in 2003 and 26 percent in 2015.
The drop in funding is a concern Curl said the committee is watching.
Erin
Klarer, vice president of government relations with the Kentucky Higher
Education Assistance Authority, agrees it's concerning.
"The cost of attendance (to college) has
certainly increased significantly while state appropriations have
decreased," she said.
What's fueling the trend is a change in the way education is viewed by policy makers, she said.
“It
is a philosophical question as to whether the cost of post-secondary
education should be borne by those who consume it or it should be funded
by the government," she said.
Emboldened
by the federal Every Student Succeeds Act that shifts power to states
and local districts, the Kentucky Department of Education is creating a
new system for testing student success in meeting standards.
Sam
Evans is the dean of Western Kentucky University's College of Education
and Behavioral Sciences. He recently visited Frankfort to discuss the
new accountability system with Education Commissioner Stephen Pruitt and
others on a steering committee. Over the next six months, Evans said,
work groups will review public feedback and group it into common themes
to help inform the new system.
At
the meeting, Evans said conversation mostly centered on moving away
from one single metric for school success to a more "dashboard" approach
that shows growth in several areas and discourages competition among
districts.
"If we can move in that direction, that’s gonna be huge," he said.
In
designing the new system, Evans stressed due diligence and said without
it "it’s going to be a recipe for failure down the road."
1 comment:
The Prichard/Chamber report falls for a considerable amount of poorly done research.
For example, the Center for Business and Economic Analysis paper cited in the Prichard/Chamber report ranks all states for their ACT Composite Scores. With the ACT still optional at student discretion in 37 states as of 2015, that is pure nonsense. Do you really think it is acceptable to rank Kentucky, where every graduate takes the ACT, to Maine, where only one in ten grads does? Even ACT, Inc. says they don’t recommend this. I asked.
By the way, 13 states did test all of their 2015 high school grads with the ACT in 2015. Properly done comparisons between those states are more valid. When I ranked white students’ ACT Composite Scores for those 13 states, Kentucky came in dead last. How does that square with what CBER and Prichard/Chamber are trying to sell us?
Another bogus ranking from CBER compares the high school graduation rates for the 50 states. Sadly, there are absolutely no uniform standards across the states for what it takes to get a diploma, so this is just more unsuitable analysis.
However, do keep in mind that while Kentucky’s published high school graduation requirements specifically include the course content of Algebra II, over the past four years no more than 40 percent of the students who took the Algebra II End-of-Course Exam in each of those years scored proficient or more. How do you reconcile that with the state’s claimed 2015 high school graduation rate of 88 percent?
Maybe, after you sift out the social promotion diplomas, Kentucky’s real high school graduation rate should only be about 40 percent. Of course, who knows what kinds of similar manipulations are going on in other states?
CBER delights in doing lots of comparisons of overall “all student” average scores for the NAEP when even the NAEP’s own reports say you need to consider differing student demographics across the states when you use this federal test to compare states (The NAEP 2009 Science Report Card has a special section on this – guess which state is the prime eighth grade example of why you need to consider disaggregated data!). What CBER’s rankings essentially do is to match up a lot of white, English speaking kids in Kentucky against non-white, sometimes non-English-as-a-first-language students in other states. This is clearly bogus; but, it sure does make Kentucky seem to be good.
How about the Chamber/Prichard report citing Education Week’s Quality Counts rankings? What a hoot. It seems like everyone involved with the Prichard/Chamber report developed convenient amnesia about Quality Counts 2013, which somehow ranked Kentucky’s education 10th best in the nation. Now we rank much lower than that in Quality Counts 2016. Did we somehow experience a disastrous decline? Or, is this just more evidence that these ranking schemes are highly unstable?
Now, here is a major takeaway: It is really hard to develop valid state-to-state education rankings. The CBER certainly doesn’t understand the data well enough to do this right, and neither does the special unit at Education Week that does Quality Counts (regular reporters at EdWeek do not develop this “stuff”).
If you want to push this stuff without comment as valid, you only undermine your own credibility. I think you want to be better than that.
Now, here’s a thought – How about a symposium at Eastern about how to do this sort of ranking better. I’ll come. It could be a nationwide attention grabber!
Post a Comment